FreshVerdict · I-9 compliance guide

I-9 compliance tool · not attorneys · not legal advice

Almost anyone may complete Section 2 for you — and you answer for every one of them

The rule employers remember is the permissive half: you may designate a representative to complete Section 2 on your behalf. The half that decides audits is the other one — the liability stays with you. Most employers have already delegated far more widely than they realise, to people nobody ever briefed.

Section 1 belongs to the employee. Section 2 is the employer’s certification that somebody looked at original documents, that they reasonably appeared genuine and to relate to the person presenting them, and that the employee is authorised to work. An employer may designate another person to make that certification. Nothing about the designation moves the consequences.

The one-sentence version: designation is broad and liability is not. Any person you designate may complete Section 2 — and if they accept the wrong document, skip the original, or leave the block unsigned, the violation is yours.

Six people who end up completing your Section 2

The obvious one

An HR employee or manager at the hiring location

The default arrangement, and the only one most employers think of as delegation at all. It works because the person completing Section 2 is in the same room as the new hire and the documents, and because there is usually somebody who has been shown how to do it. The risk here is not who is acting — it is that the training happened once, years ago, and the form has been revised since.

The accidental one

A jobsite foreman, crew leader or shift supervisor

This is delegation whether or not anyone called it that. When a framing crew, a field harvest crew or a second-shift production line hires locally and someone on site reviews the documents, that supervisor is acting as the employer's authorized representative and the employer is answerable for the result. Most employers in construction, agriculture and plant work discover this only when an inspector points at eleven Section 2 blocks completed by nine different people in nine different styles.

The remote-hire one

Someone near the employee, when the employee is nowhere near you

Hiring a worker in another state is the classic reason to designate a representative. The rule that makes this workable is that the designation is broad: employers are generally permitted to have any person they designate act on their behalf. The rule that makes it dangerous is that the employer, not the representative, answers for errors. Choosing convenience over competence is a real trade, and it is the employer who pays for it.

The one everybody asks about

A notary public

A notary may generally act as an authorized representative, but not as a notary. There is nothing on the Form I-9 to notarize — the representative completes and signs the certification as the employer's designee, and a notary seal or stamp does not belong on the form. Separately, some states regulate what notaries may charge for or perform in immigration-related matters, and a notary in some jurisdictions may be restricted or required to register before acting. Confirm your state's rule and check with counsel before making a notary your standard practice.

The contractual one

A staffing agency, PEO or third-party service

Where a staffing agency employs the worker, the agency generally completes its own I-9. That is a different arrangement from designating an agency or a service to complete your form, on your behalf, for your employee. The two get conflated constantly, and the conflation is expensive because it usually surfaces as forms that nobody completed — each party believing the other one did. Put in writing which entity is the employer and which entity completes the form.

The one to think twice about

A relative, friend or fellow employee chosen by the new hire

Federal rules on who may serve are permissive, and employers do sometimes end up with the new hire's spouse, neighbour or co-worker completing Section 2 because that is who was available. Nothing about the employer's liability softens because the representative was a volunteer. The employee should not complete Section 2 for themselves, and a representative with a personal stake in the hire is a poor place to put a certification that says original documents appeared genuine.

The delegation you never made on purpose: employers with one office think of this as a remote-hire question. Employers with crews, plants, sites or seasonal intakes have already delegated Section 2 to dozens of people — foremen, crew leaders, shift supervisors — without a written rule, a brief or a review. That is where the cross-site inconsistency in an inspection comes from, and it is found by comparing certification blocks rather than by reviewing documents.

Five authorized-representative mistakes that show up in audits

The representative fills the business fields in with their own details

The certification block asks for the representative's own name, title and signature, but the employer's business name and address. A notary who enters their own firm, or a foreman who enters the jobsite trailer, produces a form that identifies the wrong entity as the employer. In a multi-entity group sharing a payroll service or a trade name, that single field decides which company the form belongs to — and an inspector reconciling forms against a roster will notice when they do not line up.

Nobody physically examined the original documents

The representative's signature certifies personal examination of the originals presented by the employee. A scan emailed ahead, a photo held up on a phone screen, or a video call is not that examination — unless the employer is enrolled in E-Verify and properly using the DHS alternative remote procedure, which is a separate and conditional route rather than a general permission. The two paths get blended in practice: a representative is designated and then does the review over video anyway, which leaves the employer with neither route completed correctly.

The three-day clock keeps running while the representative is arranged

Section 2 is ordinarily due within three business days of the first day of work for pay, and finding somebody willing to act does not pause that. Remote hires are where this fails most often, because the search for a representative starts after the employee has already begun working. Line up who will act before the start date, not after it.

Every site does it differently

Ten locations delegating to ten supervisors with no shared instruction produces ten dialects of the same form: different document combinations requested, different date formats, some blocks left unsigned. Inconsistency is its own finding. It also creates discrimination exposure, because a supervisor improvising about which documents to ask for is exactly how over-documentation and document-specification problems start — the territory covered in the anti-discrimination guide.

Treating delegation as a transfer of responsibility

This is the mistake underneath the other four. The employer remains liable for what its representative certifies, including errors, omissions and anything false. There is no version of this where an outside party absorbs the penalty. Delegation moves the task and keeps the risk, which is why who you designate and how you brief them is a compliance decision rather than an administrative one.

A five-step way to bring delegation under control

None of this requires a compliance department. It requires deciding who may act, telling them the same thing, and then actually looking at what they signed.

Step 1

Write down who is allowed to act, by role

One short internal rule: which roles may complete Section 2, and who approves an exception. If the honest answer today is whoever is standing there, that is the finding. Naming the roles turns invisible delegation into a controlled one.

Step 2

Give every designated person the same one-page brief

What to examine, that originals must be seen in person, that the employee chooses which documents to present from the acceptable lists, whose business name and address go in the certification block, and that the block must be signed and dated on the day of examination. One page, identical everywhere.

Step 3

Fix the timing before the start date

For any hire who will not be in front of your own staff, identify the representative during onboarding rather than on day three. The deadline is measured from the first day of work for pay, so the arrangement has to exist before the employee starts.

Step 4

Audit the certification block across sites, not just within them

Pull Section 2 for every location and compare the blocks side by side. You are looking for wrong business details, missing titles, unsigned certifications, dates that fall outside the window and document combinations that vary suspiciously by location. Cross-site comparison finds the pattern; a single-site review never does.

Step 5

Correct what is correctable, in the documented way, and date it honestly

The accepted method does not change for a representative's error: strike through the incorrect entry, enter the correct information, initial and date the change, leave the original legible. The person making the correction dates it the day they make it. A certification signed late is a defect; a certification dated to look timely is a much more serious problem.

What it costs when a delegation goes wrong at scale

Paperwork violations carry per-form civil penalties running from $288 up to $2,861 per violation under the 2026 schedule used throughout this site. The arithmetic that matters is the multiplication: one supervisor completing Section 2 the same wrong way through a hiring season does not produce one violation, it produces one per form. A delegation problem is systemic by nature, which is why it scales faster than almost any other category of I-9 error.

The conditional remote-examination route is set out in remote I-9 verification 2026, the over-documentation and document-specification traps a briefed representative avoids are in I-9 anti-discrimination and IER traps, the accepted way to fix a defective certification is in I-9 correction and remediation, the per-error dollar mechanics are in I-9 penalties by error type, and the document-by-document employer questions are answered in the M-274 handbook common questions.

Find out what your foremen actually signed.

FreshVerdict scans your Forms I-9, flags every paperwork error that carries a 2026 penalty, separates substantive defects from technical ones and shows the USCIS-correct fix for each — including the certification blocks completed by people who never got a brief. Start with a free readiness check.

Check my I-9 audit-readiness →

Authorized representative FAQ

Who can be an authorized representative for Form I-9 purposes?

Employers are generally permitted to designate any person they choose to complete Section 2 on their behalf — a manager at another location, a supervisor on site, a notary public, a personnel or agency contact, or another trusted third party. There is no federal certification or licence required to act. The important qualifier is the one that follows: the employer remains liable for any violations connected with the form or the verification process, including violations committed by the representative it designated. Confirm the current rule against the Form I-9 instructions and the USCIS Handbook for Employers (M-274).

Can a notary public complete Section 2 of the Form I-9?

Generally yes, but acting as the employer's authorized representative rather than in a notarial capacity. Nothing on the Form I-9 is notarized, and a notary seal or stamp should not be applied to it. Some states separately regulate notaries performing immigration-related services, and in those states a notary may be restricted or may need to be registered before acting. Check the rule in the state where the examination will happen, and take advice before adopting notaries as a standard practice across multiple states.

Does using an authorized representative shift liability away from the employer?

No. This is the single most important point on the page. Designation moves the task, not the responsibility. If the representative accepts a document that is not acceptable, fails to examine originals, leaves the certification unsigned or records something inaccurate, the employer is answerable for the resulting form. That is also why the identity and briefing of the representative matter more than employers usually assume.

Can the representative review the employee's documents over video?

Not as a general matter. The certification is a statement that the original documents were examined, and the ordinary expectation is physical examination in the employee's physical presence. There is a separate DHS alternative procedure permitting remote examination, but it is conditional — it is generally available to employers enrolled in E-Verify and in good standing, and it carries its own requirements around retaining copies and noting its use. Employers get into trouble by taking the flexibility of the representative rule and the flexibility of the remote rule and assuming the two combine freely. The conditions of the remote route are covered in the remote I-9 verification guide.

Whose name and address go in the Section 2 certification block?

The representative signs with their own name and title, but the business name and address recorded are the employer's, not the representative's. Getting this backwards is the most common authorized-representative error, and it is consequential in groups where several related entities share a worksite, a payroll provider or a trading name, because the field is part of how a form is matched to the entity that employed the worker.

Can an employee complete Section 2 for themselves, or for a colleague?

An employee should not complete Section 2 for their own Form I-9 — Section 1 is the employee's part and Section 2 is the employer's certification, and collapsing the two undermines the point of the certification. A different, existing employee acting as the designated representative for a new hire is a common arrangement and is generally permissible, but the employer should treat it as delegation: the same brief, the same expectations, and the same liability sitting with the employer.

What does a bad delegation actually cost?

Paperwork violations are assessed per form. Under the 2026 schedule used throughout this site, they run from $288 up to $2,861 per violation. Because the assessment is per form rather than per employer, an untrained supervisor who completed Section 2 the same wrong way for a whole season generates a total driven by headcount rather than by the seriousness of any one mistake. That is why the cross-site pattern is worth finding before an inspection rather than during one.

How do I audit my authorized-representative practice?

Start with the certification blocks rather than the documents. Compare Section 2 across every location and every person who has signed one, looking for the wrong business details, missing titles and signatures, dates outside the three-business-day window, and document combinations that vary by site. FreshVerdict scans Forms I-9, flags the errors that carry a 2026 penalty and shows the USCIS-correct fix for each — it is compliance software, not legal advice, and the design of a multi-state delegation practice is worth reviewing with counsel.

Related: the 2026 I-9 self-audit checklist, the records ICE demands beyond the I-9, the I-9 reverification guide, and the 2026 ICE audit timeline.

FreshVerdict is an I-9 compliance tool — not attorneys, and this is general information, not legal advice. Who may act as an authorized representative, what that person must examine and how the certification block is completed are governed by the Form I-9 and its official instructions, the USCIS Handbook for Employers (M-274) and the E-Verify program rules; state law may separately restrict notaries acting in immigration-related matters. Confirm current requirements against those sources and engage immigration counsel before adopting a delegation practice across multiple states.